Welfare Estimation Using Aggregate and Individual-Observations Models: A Comparison Using Monte Carlo Techniques
Daniel Hellerstein
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
Due to the weak behavioral foundations of aggregate demand models, zonal travel cost models have been largely abandoned in favor of models based on individual observations. However, sample selection difficulties in individual-observation models often require the use of distribution-sensitive limited-dependent variables estimators. In this paper I use Monte-Carlo simulations to investigate whether the bias from aggregation is worse than possible bias from these narrowly specified estimators. Somewhat surprisingly, the results indicate that zonal models often outperform the individual-observation models, especially when using an aggregate model that incorporates intrazonal variance of the explanatory variables.
Keywords: aggregation bias; individual-observation models; zonal models. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C43 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)
Published in American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77.3(1995): pp. 620-630
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25267/1/MPRA_paper_25267.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Welfare Estimation Using Aggregate and Individual-Observation Models: A Comparison Using Monte Carlo Techniques (1995) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:25267
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().