Do Public Sector Contracts And Policy Towards Small Firms Matter?: Evidence From Women Business Enterprises

Godfrey Cadogan

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This paper provides an empirical investigation of the agency relationship between the public sector and small firms targeted for assistance by examining micro and macro data for a cross section of eligible women business enterprises (WBEs). Using hedonic sales and employment indices we find that 2% of firm sales is lost to negative gender externality. We show that under asymmetric information public sector transfers neither compensate for this loss of sales nor do they increase employment. When we impose transfer restrictions under perfect information, sales is unaffected but firms respond by increasing the amount of part time employees hired and do not increase full time employment. Moreover, we show that WBE presence at the state level depend on prime-contractor-sub-contractor relationships and that if long term contracts are offered then business risks are reduced and firms increase employment levels because of securitized sales. Further, formation of new WBEs are directly proportional to the amount of new small business loans provided in the economy after controlling for size and population effects. The evidence suggests that after President Richard Nixon signed Executive Order 11625 the velocity of new WBE formation is approximately 39% of the difference between policy targets and actual realization. We introduce an entrepreneurial reaction function which shows that firms react to private and public sector funding incentives but not to the level of education attainment and overall business formation in the economy. We find that agency problems provide incentives for firms to engage in strategic misrepresentation. Thus, the incidence of adverse selection in current transfer programs are as high as 60% in some instances; imposes an asymmetric residual loss on the public sector, and contrary to the goals of benevolent policy, transfers are skewed in favor of less needy firms.

Keywords: negative externalities, compensatory financial contracts, hedonic indices; business risk; entrepreneur reaction function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D21 D49 D63 G18 H23 H76 H81 J16 J21 L10 L25 L26 L53 M21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1994-05, Revised 2010-09-14
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26595/1/MPRA_paper_26595.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:26595

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().