Pourquoi s'intéresser à la notion d'"Evidence -based policy" ?

Why should we care about evidence-based policy?

Catherine Laurent, Jacques Baudry, Marielle Berrier-Solliec, Marc Kirsch, Daniel Perraud, Bruno Tinel, Aurélie Trouvé, Nicky Allsopp, Partrick Bonnafous, Françoise Burel, Maria Jose Carneiro, Christophe Giraud, Pierre Labarte, Frank Matose and Agnès Ricroch

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: "Evidence-based medicine” approaches began to be formalized in the early 1990s to promote a conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in decision-making on care for individual patients. These approaches were subsequently extended to other spheres of public decision (education, justice, environment, poverty alleviation, etc.), giving birth to the concept of "evidence-based policy” (EBP). In the Francophone world, with the exception of the medical sector, these approaches are not well known. This is partly a problem of translation. In French, no concept associates the idea of empirical corroboration with that of proof, unlike English where they are both encapsulated in the word "evidence". The lack of familiarity with EBP also results from an intellectual tradition that is suspicious of simplistic pragmatisms in public action, which are believed to favour a principle of immediate effectiveness, regardless of the multiple dimensions of such action. The increasing use of the EBP concept is consequently often equated to mere rhetoric or to an attempt to depoliticize the debate by defending a normative model of decision-making grounded in the rational choice theory. This article presents a critical analysis of the debates on EBP. It shows how these debates argue for a renewal of positive approaches to public decision-making, primarily by proposing methods that facilitate circulation within the realm of existing knowledge, and that assess the quality of the empirical content of that knowledge. The article emphasizes the point that such debates contributes to offering an alternative to the increasing use of knowledge models based too exclusively on expert opinions or simulations that disclaim empirical validation tests. Finally, it suggests the need for more in-depth reflection on the types of evidence and the levels of proof that could support the design, implementation and evaluation of public policies, and points to some paths in that direction.

Keywords: Evidence based policy; public policies; development; scientific knowledge; proofs; agriculture; environment; biodiversity; France; Brasil; South Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B29 D8 N5 O3 Q01 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Revue Tiers Monde 200 (2009): pp. 853-873

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27073/1/MPRA_paper_27073.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Pourquoi s'intéresser à la notion d' « evidence-based policy » ? (2009)
Working Paper: Pourquoi s'intéresser à la notion d' "évidence-based policy"? (2009)
Working Paper: Pourquoi s'intéresser à la notion d' "évidence-based policy"? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:27073

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().