Gun laws and sudden death: Did the Australian firearms legislation of 1996 make a difference?
J Baker and
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Mass murders in Dunblane, United Kingdom, and Port Arthur, Australia, provoked rapid responses from the governments of both countries. Major changes to Australian laws resulted in a controversial buy-back of longarms and tighter legislation. The Australian situation enables evaluation of the effect of a national buy-back, accompanied by tightened legislation in a country with relatively secure borders. AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) was used to predict future values of the time series for homicide, suicide and accidental death before and after the 1996 National Firearms Agreement (NFA). When compared with observed values, firearm suicide was the only parameter the NFA may have influenced, although societal factors could also have influenced observed changes. The findings have profound implications for future firearm legislation policy direction.
Keywords: Firearms; legislation; homicide; suicide (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C20 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in British Journal of Criminology 47 (2007): pp. 455-469
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/40534/1/MPRA_paper_40534.pdf original version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:40534
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().