Being in the Right Place: A Natural Field Experiment on List Position and Consumer Choice
Marco Novarese () and
Chris M. Wilson
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
By randomising the order in which new economics research papers are presented in email alerts and tracking economists’ subsequent download activity, this paper uses a natural field experiment to better understand the reasons why individuals show a disproportionate tendency to select items listed in top position. Using a novel method, the paper tests and rejects three common explanations regarding item order, choice fatigue and position as a quality signal. The paper then further demonstrates how the causes of top position effects vary significantly with list length, and points to some alternative explanations.
Keywords: Position Effects; Order Effects; Primacy Effects; Recency Effects; Choice Fatigue; Prominence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D01 D03 L0 L00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48074/1/MPRA_paper_48074.pdf original version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:48074
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().