Bargaining over the Distribution of Seats in French Regional Elections

Karl Dunz

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This paper examines the bargaining over how to combine lists of candidates between rounds of the 2004 and 2010 French regional elections. Regressions support the hypothesis that a party's fraction of a coalition's total seats won will be equal to that party's fraction of the total first-round vote of all parties represented in the combined list. However, there is a slight tendency for small parties to get less than implied by this hypothesis. This is the opposite of what is commonly found in studies of coalition formation in parliamentary systems. The paper provides some support for the hypothesis that this is due to the electoral rules determining when a party is allowed to maintain their list in the second round. Finally, this paper examines properties of the function describing how a combined list divides any number of seats won.

Keywords: Gamson; bargaining; French elections; candidate lists; seat allocation functions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D7 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-07
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48777/1/MPRA_paper_48777.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:48777

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().