 Labor Market Rigidity and Business Cycle VolatilityPhilip Jung () and Moritz Kuhn MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Abstract: Comparing labor markets of the United States and Germany over the period 1980 − 2004 uncovers three stylized differences: (1) transition rates from unemployment to employment (UE) were lower by a factor of 5 and inflow rates from employment to unemployment (EU) were lower by a factor of 4 in Germany. (2) The volatility of the UE rate was equal but the EU rate was 2.3 times more volatile in Germany. (3) In Germany EU flows contributed 60 − 70% to the unemployment volatility while in the U.S. they contributed only 30−40%. We show that these differences can be largely explained by a single factor, namely a lower efficiency in matching unemployed workers to open positions in Germany. Alternative explanations like employment protection, the benefit system, union power, or rigid earnings are likely not the main driving force for the cross-country difference. The lower matching efficiency leads to a substantial propagation of shocks. After an adverse shock peak unemployment is reached after 3 quarters in the United States but only after 9 quarters in Germany. Keywords: Business Cycle Fluctuations; Labor Market Institutions; Unemployment; Endogenous Separation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:48946 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.