Defining and Measuring Metropolitan Regions: a rationale

Alan Freeman and Paul Cheshire

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This paper was presented an OECD working group of city measurement, in Paris, in November 2006. It presents the rationale for, and a method for measuring, the ‘Functional Urban Region’ of London which establishes an estimate of its true economic extent, independent of its actual or historical boundaries. Noting that there is no consistent definition of the boundaries of ‘economic’ London, and that different suppliers of data work on the basis of definitions that not only conflict, but produce inconsistent and widely different data about London, it applies the FUR-based method developed by the GEMACA group for defining and measuring cities. This system, similar to the SMSA system employed in the USA by the Office of Management and Budget, calculates a core, defined either as a densely populated area or an area with a high job density, and a ‘commuting field’ containing people that regularly travel into or communicate with the core for economic purposes, principally work. It differs from the Urban Audit system in use at the time that this paper was presented, insofar as the UA system uses a mix of administratively defined cores and economically defined commuting fields, and varies the parameters used for both in accordance with local views, leading to a lack of comparability. The paper exhibits the effect of various choices for defining the core and commuting field, and shows that the population of London in 2000 lay somewhere between 12,250,000 and 13,920,000. The final choice of parameters – and the eventual estimate of population – should pay due regard to issues of international compatibility, but the method itself is eminently practical.

Keywords: City; global city; Functional Urban Region; Larger Urban Zone; Territorial Indicators; Metropolitan Region; pluralism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H70 J0 R0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-11-26, Revised 2006-11-26
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/52714/1/MPRA_paper_52714.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:52714

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().