Modeling and Forecasting Volatility – How Reliable are modern day approaches?
Anirudh Mehta and
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
This study explores the volatility models and evaluates the quality of one-step ahead forecasts of volatility constructed by (1) GARCH, (2) TGARCH, (3) Risk metrics and (4) Historical volatility. Volatility forecasts suggest that TGARCH performs relatively best in term of MSPE, followed by GARCH, Risk metrics and historical volatility. In terms of VaR, we test for correct unconditional coverage and index- Dependence of violations using Likelihood Ratio tests. The tests suggest that VaR forecasts at 90 % and 95% have desirable properties. Regarding 99% VaR forecasts, We find significant evidence that suggests none of the models can reliably predict at this confidence level.
Keywords: Asset pricing; Volatility Forecasting; GARCH; T-GARCH; Risk metrics; LR ratio; VaR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 C12 C15 C19 C51 C53 C58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ets, nep-for, nep-ore and nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59788/1/MPRA_paper_59788.pdf original version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:59788
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Joachim Winter ().