Construction Corrupts: Empirical Evidence from a Panel of 42 Countries
Andreas Kyriacou,
Leonel Muinelo-Gallo and
Oriol Roca-Sagalés
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
The construction sector, whether privately or publically financed, is characterized by potentially large rents and government intervention. Not surprisingly then, both case-study and survey evidence has been provided highlighting the problem of corruption in this sector. In this article, we test the proposition that a bigger construction sector is likely to be inimical to clean government based on a panel of 42 countries over the period 1995 to 2011. We control for a range of potentially counfounding variables and the expectation that corrupt public officials may favor the development of this sector because it increases the volume of rents available to them. Our empirical evidence shows that a larger construction sector will tend to worsen perceptions of the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain.
Keywords: Corruption; Construction Sector; Empirical Estimates; Reverse Causality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D73 L74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-01-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61457/1/MPRA_paper_61457.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Construction corrupts: empirical evidence from a panel of 42 countries (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:61457
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().