EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Credit Smoothing and Determinants of Loan Loss Reserves. Evidence from Europe, US, Asia and Africa

Peterson Ozili

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This study provides a link between accounting, managerial discretion and monetary policy. Monetary authorities encourage banking institutions to supply credit to the economy. Increased bank supply of credit is a good thing but too much of a good can be a bad thing. This paper investigates under what circumstances excessive loan supply ceases to be a good thing and how bank managers react to this. After examining 82 bank samples, I find that (i) bank underestimate the level of reserves to boost credit supply in line with expectations of monetary authorities, particularly, in Asia and UK (ii) consistent with the credit smoothing hypothesis, US and Chinese banks smooth credit supply to minimize unintended stock market signaling; (iii) managerial priority during a recession is to smooth credit over time rather than to boost credit supply; (iv) non-performing loans, bank portfolio risk and loan portfolio size are significant determinants of the level of loan loss reserves; and (v) credit risk, proxy by loan growth, do not have a significant impact on loan loss reserves but tend to have some significant effect during a recession, particularly, when change in loans is negative. The implications of these findings are two-fold: (i) bank managers use their discretion over reserves to influence bank credit supply; (ii) bank supply of credit is not solely driven by loan demand but by a combination of several factors, particularly, capital market concerns, the need to avoid scrutiny from monetary authorities, and country-specific factors.

Keywords: Credit Risk; Monetary Policy; Loan Loss Reserves; Credit Smoothing; Accounting; Signaling; Bank supervision. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E52 E58 G21 G28 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-03-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban, nep-mac and nep-mon
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/62641/1/MPRA_paper_62641.pdf original version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/63296/1/MPRA_paper_62641.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/63297/1/MPRA_paper_62641.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/63298/1/MPRA_paper_63298.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68349/1/MPRA_paper_63298.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/63304/8/MPRA_paper_63304.pdf revised version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:62641

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:62641