Considering household size in contingent valuation studies

Michael Ahlheim and Friedrich Schneider ()

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In many empirical contingent valuation studies one finds that household size, i.e. the number of household members, is negatively correlated with stated household willingness to pay for the realization of environmental projects. This observation is rather puzzling because in larger households more people can benefit from an environmental improvement than in small households. Therefore, the overall benefit should be greater for larger households. A plausible explanation could be that household budgets are tighter for large families than for smaller families with the same overall family income. The fact that larger families can afford only smaller willingness to pay statements in contingent valuation surveys than smaller families with the same income and the same preferences might have consequences for the allocation of public funds whenever the realization of an environmental project is made dependent on the outcome of a contingent valuation study. This paper shows how the use of household equivalence scales for the assessment of environmental projects with the contingent valuation method can serve to reduce the discrimination of members of large families.

Keywords: contingent valuation and household size; willingness to pay; environmental project; family income; valuation service; household equivalent scales. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 H43 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Published in Environmental Economics 1.4(2013): pp. 112-123

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/62898/1/ee_2013_01_Ahlheim.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Considering household size in Contingent Valuation studies (2013)
Working Paper: Considering Household Size in Contingent Valuation Studies (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:62898

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().