New Accounting Rules for Loan Loss Provisions in Europe: Much Ado about Nothing?
Enrico Onali and
Gianluca Ginesti
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
While there is a vigorous academic and policy debate about the implications of the Incurred Loss Model (ILM) for financial stability, there is no empirical evidence on whether the new Expected Loss Model (ELM) introduced by IASB benefits international investors. We address this relevant issue by investigating the price reaction to announcements related to the impairment rules incorporated in IFRS 9 on a sample of 137 European listed banks for the period from November 2009 to July 2014. We provide evidence that the abnormal returns related to these events are substantially uncorrelated with proxies of timely loss recognition, earnings management, and capital management, suggesting that the new ELM is not perceived to bring about substantial benefits as compared to the ILM. These results are robust to confounding events, international media coverage, and winsorizing techniques. Bootstrap analysis supports the hypothesis that significant results for some of the events and some of the proxies may be due to over-sized tests for the sample period under examination. Our findings shed light on a recent claim in the literature that the quality of financial statements bears at best second-order effects on firm value.
Keywords: earnings management; IFRS 9; impairment; loan loss provisions; stock market reaction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G1 G2 M4 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-01-20, Revised 2015-05-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/64266/1/MPRA_paper_64266.pdf original version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/64467/3/MPRA_paper_64467.pdf revised version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:64266
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().