The Precautionary Principle as a Heuristic Patch

Kim Kaivanto and Winston Kwon

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In this paper we attempt to recover an integrated conception of the Precautionary Principle (PP). The alpha=0.05$ inferential-threshold convention widely employed in science is ill-suited to the requirements of policy decision making because it is fixed and unresponsive to the cost trade-offs that are the defining concern of policy decision making. Statistical decision theory -- particularly in its Signal-Detection Theory (SDT) variant -- provides a standard framework within which to incorporate the (mis)classification costs associated with deciding between intervention and non-intervention. We show that the PP implements preventive intervention in precisely those circumstances where the SDT-based model yields a (1,1) corner solution. Thus the PP can be understood as a heuristic variant of the SDT corner solution, which in turn serves to patch the incongruity between the inferential practices of science and the inferential requirements of policy decision making. Furthermore, SDT's analytical structure directs attention to a small number of variables -- (mis)classification costs and prior probabilities -- as determinants of the (1,1) corner solution. Subjective biases impinging upon these variables -- omission bias, protected values, and the affect heuristic in particular, moderated by the decision maker's industry-aligned (insider) or industry-opposed (outsider) status -- combine within SDT to successfully retrodict features of the PP previously considered puzzling, if not inconsistent or incoherent. These psychological biases do not exclude, and may in part reflect, the decision maker's deontological moral beliefs, or indeed social norms embodied in the nation's legal system (common law vs. civil law).

Keywords: precautionary principle; misclassification costs; scientific uncertainty; omission bias; affect heuristic; null-hypothesis significance testing; signal-detection theory; behavioral economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 K32 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/67036/1/MPRA_paper_67036.pdf original version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/67082/8/MPRA_paper_67082.pdf revised version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The precautionary principle as a heuristic patch (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:67036

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().