Publish and Perish: Creative Destruction and Macroeconomic Theory
Jean-Bernard Chatelain () and
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Macroeconomic theories of the 1980s faced accelerated depreciation when not sudden death. By contrast with econometrics and microeconomics and despite massive progress in access to data and the use of statistical softwares, macroeconomic theory appears not to be a cumulative science so far. When attempts are done to settle controversies by "nature" (testing the theories), they are designed to fail due to Gresham's law of selecting theories based on too many parameters, which are weakly or non-identified when testing them. Two examples are provided, one in growth theory and testing convergence, one in business cycles theory and testing inflation persistence.
Keywords: Macroeconomic theory; controversies; identification; economic growth; convergence; inflation persistence. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B22 B23 B41 C52 E31 O41 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/76825/1/MPRA_paper_76825.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Publish and Perish: Creative Destruction and Macroeconomic Theory (2018)
Working Paper: Publish and Perish: Creative Destruction and Macroeconomic Theory (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:76825
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().