Pitfalls in the Development of Falsification Tests: An Illustration from the Recent Minimum Wage Literature

Jeffrey Clemens

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This paper examines a ``falsification test'' from the recent minimum wage literature. The analysis illustrates several pitfalls associated with developing and interpreting such exercises, which are increasingly common in applied empirical work. Clemens and Wither (2014) present evidence that minimum wage increases contributed to the magnitude of employment declines among low-skilled groups during the Great Recession. Zipperer (2016) presents regressions that he interprets as falsification tests for Clemens and Wither's baseline regression. He interprets his results as evidence that Clemens and Wither's estimates are biased. In this paper, I demonstrate that Zipperer's falsification tests are uninformative for their intended purpose. The properties of clustered robust standard errors do not carry over from Clemens and Wither's baseline specification (27 treatment states drawn from 50) to Zipperer's falsification tests (3 or 5 ``placebo treatment'' states drawn from 23). Confidence intervals calculated using a setting-appropriate permutation test extend well beyond the tests' point estimates. Further, I show that the sub-samples to which Zipperer's procedure assigns ``placebo treatment status'' were disproportionately affected by severe housing crises. His test's point estimates are highly sensitive to the exclusion of the most extreme housing crisis experiences from the sample. An inspection of data on the housing market, prime aged employment, overall unemployment rates, and aggregate income per capita reveals the test's premise that regional neighbors form reasonable counterfactuals to be incorrect in this setting.

Keywords: Falsification Test; Program Evaluation; Minimum Wage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C18 J2 J3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-06-14
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-lma
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/80154/1/MPRA_paper_80154.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:80154

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().