EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Управление и оценка на аграрната устойчивост – опит, предизвикателства и уроци от България и Китай

Governing and assessment of agrarian sustainability - experiences, challenges, and lessons from Bulgaria and China

Hrabrin Bachev (), Bojidar Ivanov, Dessislava Toteva, Emilia Sokolova, Dimitar Terziev, Dimitar Nikolov, Donka Radeva, Minka Chopeva, Hongfei Li and Shengquan Che

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: This paper applies interdisciplinary approach and assesses the system of governance and the level of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria and China. The first part presents a holistic and practically applicable for the contemporary conditions of development of Bulgarian and Chinese agriculture framework for assessing the system of governance and the level of agrarian sustainability. The suggested approach is broadly experimented in Bulgaria for assessing the governance system of agrarian sustainability and the sustainability level of Bulgarian agriculture. In the second part the system of governance of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria is analyzed and the efficiency of institutional environment and diverse market, private, collective, public and hybrid modes are evaluated. In the third part an assessment is made on the economic, social, environmental and integral sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture at national, sectoral, regional, ecosystem and farm levels. Factors for improving agrarian sustainability are also identified and the innovation activity and sustainability of alternative agriculture estimated. In the fourth part the governance and sustainability in Chinese agriculture at national, regional and local levels is analyzed, and results of a number of in-depth studies from Shanghai area are presented. Comparative study is also made on the systems of governance and the levels of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria and China. Finally, the experiences and challenges in the governance and assessment of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria and China are summarized and directions for improvement of research, management and assessment practices suggested.

Keywords: Agrarian governance; agrarian sustainability; market; private; collective; public; hybrid modes; assessment; China; Bulgaria (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L1 L14 L2 Q1 Q12 Q13 Q15 Q18 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tra
Date: 2018-01-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83998/1/MPRA_paper_83998.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:83998

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Joachim Winter ().

 
Page updated 2018-02-16
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:83998