Trial and settlement negotiations between asymmetrically skilled parties

Bertrand Chopard, Thomas Cortade and Eric Langlais

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Parties engaged in a litigation generally enter the discovery process with different informations regarding their case and/or an unequal endowment in terms of skill and ability to produce evidence and predict the outcome of a trial. Hence, they have to bear different legal costs to assess the (equilibrium) plaintiff's win rate. The paper analyses pretrial negotiations and revisits the selection hypothesis in the case where these legal expenditures are private information. This assumption is consistent with empirical evidence (Osborne, 1999). Two alternative situations are investigated, depending on whether there exists a unilateral or a bilateral informational asymmetry.\ Our general result is that efficient pretrial negotiations select cases with the smallest legal expenditures as those going to trial, while cases with largest costs prefer to settle. Under the one-sided asymmetric information assumption, we find that the American rule yields more trials and higher aggregate legal expenditures than the French and British rules. The two-sided case leads to a higher rate of trials, but in contrast provides less clear-cut predictions regarding the influence of fee-shifting.

Keywords: litigation; unilateral and bilateral asymmetric information; legal expenditures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D0 D82 K0 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-06-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta and nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8995/1/MPRA_paper_8995.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Trial and settlement negotiations between asymmetrically skilled parties (2010)
Working Paper: Trial and settlement negotiations between asymmetrically skilled parties (2010)
Working Paper: Trial and settlement negotiations between asymmetrically skilled parties (2008)
Working Paper: Trial and settlement negotiations between asymmetrically skilled parties (2008)
Working Paper: Trial and settlement negotiations between asymmetrically skilled parties (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:8995

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().