Being in the Right Place: A Natural Field Experiment on the Causes of Position Effects in Individual Choice
Mark Harris (),
Marco Novarese () and
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
This paper uses a natural field experiment to better understand why individuals tend to select items at the top of lists. After randomizing the order in which new economics research papers are presented in email alerts and measuring the subsequent downloads, we provide robust evidence of position effects. Moreover, our novel user-level data offers two key findings: i) most users exhibit both top and bottom position effects, and ii) distinct groups of users consider the listed items in different orders. These results allow us to conclude that the causes of top position effects are complex and heterogeneous across individuals, but are most consistent with a version of choice fatigue where users consider the listed items in a non-monotonic order.
Keywords: Position Effects; Order Effects; Choice Fatigue; Prominence; Lists (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D01 D83 L00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/94072/1/MPRA_paper_94072.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Being in the right place: A natural field experiment on the causes of position effects in individual choice (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:94072
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().