Changing Competitive Landscape: Transition Policy’s Blind Spots
Jorge Blazquez (),
Amro Elshurafa and
Additional contact information
Nora Nezamuddin: King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center
Discussion Papers from King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center
For the past two to three decades, and particularly in the wake of the Great Recession, clean energy transitions have been sold as a three-for-the-price-ofone policy: creating “green collar” jobs to get the unemployed back to work, using domestic resources to reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels, and all while reducing carbon emissions. The first of two implicit goals of this “three-fer” was the development of local, high tech industries supported by policy-driven domestic demand for wind and solar equipment. These high tech industries would, in turn, deliver the second goal of driving down the costs of clean energy technologies to the point where they would no longer require policy support.
Keywords: Carbon Emissions; Cost Competitiveness; Energy Independence; Energy Security; Energy Transition; Feed in Tariffs; Government Incentives; Green Jobs; Incumbent Fuel Technology; Investment Tax Credits; Policy Development; Renewable Energy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.kapsarc.org/research/publications/chan ... policys-blind-spots/ First version, 2017 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:prc:dpaper:ks-1410-dp04a
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael Gaffney ().