A Comparison of Alternative Programs for Climate Policies

Tarek Atalla, Simona Bigerna () and Carlo Andrea Bollino ()

Discussion Papers from King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center

Abstract: This research paper compares the relative welfare impact of different options for allocating the financing burden of climate change mitigation policies. Focusing on efficient ways to finance policies aimed at climate change mitigation, not only at direct carbon reduction, could delink the issue of carbon taxation from carbon emissions. A Pigouvian tax is the traditional way of correcting for negative externalities, or the undesirable consequences for society arising from the actions of a company or industry sector, by levying additional taxes on that activity. Pigouvian taxation corrects society’s welfare loss, however, from the viewpoint of the private sector, such taxation imposes a deadweight economic loss with respect to the original private equilibrium. As an alternative, we evaluate a methodology that could fund investments to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and we show that the policy we consider to be optimal from a tax standpoint – Ramsey pricing can both improve world welfare and be politically more acceptable than other pricing options. Rather than focus directly on emissions reduction by taxing energy, a Ramsey pricing solution can be designed to minimize distortions while raising funds for investment in climate change mitigation.

Keywords: Climate Change; Pigouvian tax; Ramsey pricing; Social Welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2018-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.kapsarc.org/research/publications/a-co ... or-climate-policies/ First version, 2018 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:prc:dpaper:ks-2018-dp48

DOI: 10.30573/KS--2018-DP48

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael Gaffney ().