Reforming Budgetary Language

David Bradford

No 128, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies.

Abstract: In the context of several examples of problems associated with present budgetary conventions, I revisit Musgrave's conceptual division of the government's program into Allocation, Distribution and Stabilization Branch subbudgets. I suggest progress towards Musgrave's ideal of a more informative budgetary "language," one less dependent on arbitrary institutional labeling, must be based on the nonarbitrary description of the individual's economic environment, as it is affected by government. As a first approximation, that environment can be summed up in terms of the individual's budget constraint and levels of public goods provided. Simple models suggest that an unambiguous budgetary language may be feasible but there remains much to clarify about both the objectives of the exercise and the specifics of methods to deal with particular problems.

JEL-codes: H11 H20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://gceps.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/74bradford.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Reforming Budgetary Language (2001)
Working Paper: Reforming Budgetary Language (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cepsud:74

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().