Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of environmental management for malaria control

Jurg Utzinger, Yesim Tozan and Burton Singer
Additional contact information
Jurg Utzinger: Princeton University
Yesim Tozan: Princeton University
Burton Singer: Princeton University

No 266, Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing.

Abstract: Roll Back Malaria aims at halving the current burden of the disease by the year 2010. The focus is on sub-Saharan Africa, and it is proposed to implement efficacious and cost effective control strategies. However, the evidence-base of such information is scarce, and a notable missing element is discussion of the potential of environmental management. We reviewed the literature and identified multiple malaria control programmes that incorporated environmental management as the central feature. Prominent among them are programmes launched in 1929 and implemented for 2 decades at copper mining communities in Zambia. The full package of control measures consisted of vegetation clearance, modification of river boundaries, draining swamps, oil application to open water bodies and house screening. Part of the population also benefited from quinine administration and was sleeping under mosquito nets. Monthly malaria incidence rates and vector densities were used for surveillance and adaptive tuning of the environmental management strategies to achieve a high level of performance. Within 3-5 years, malaria related mortality, morbidity and incidence rates were reduced by 70-95%. Over the entire 20 years of implementation, the programme had averted an estimated 4,173 deaths and 161,205 malaria attacks. The estimated costs per death and malaria attack averted were US$ 858 and US$ 22.20, respectively. Over the initial 3-5 year start-up period, analogous to the short-duration of cost-effectiveness analyses of current studies, we estimated that the costs per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted were US$ 524-591. However, the strategy has a track record of becoming cost-effective in the longer term, as maintenance costs were much lower; US$ 22-92 per DALY averted. In view of fewer adverse ecological effects, increased sustainability and better uses of local resources and knowledge, environmental management integrated with pharmacological, insecticidal and bednet interventions could substantially increase the chances of rolling back malaria.

JEL-codes: I19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0B ... QUxZb2VYTE0yTzg/view
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 400 Bad Request (https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBQUxZb2VYTE0yTzg/view [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://www.google.com/a/princeton.edu/ServiceLogin?service=wise&passive=1209600&osid=1&continue=https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBQUxZb2VYTE0yTzg/view&followup=https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBQUxZb2VYTE0yTzg/view [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://idp.princeton.edu/idp/profile/SAML2/Redirect/SSO?SAMLRequest=fVJNT9wwEL1X4j9EvudrS2llbYK2INSVaBuxgQM3x5kklpwZ43F26b9vNgsqPcD1%2Bc37GM%2F68nm00R48G8JC5EkmIkBNrcG%2BEPf1TfxNXJZnn9asRuvkZgoD3sHTBByieRJZLg%2BFmDxKUmxYohqBZdByt%2Fl5K1dJJp2nQJqsiLbXhQAytnF93wy2p3503UAturZrcCBEYxrqWxodiOjhNdbqGGvLPMEWOSgMM5StvsTZeZx%2FrfMLmZ3L7POjiKoXp%2B8GTw0%2BitWcSCx%2F1HUVV7939SKwNy34XzO7ED1RbyHRNB7tK8Vs9jPcKctzvA0z%2BDAHvCLkaQS%2FA783Gu7vbgsxhOBYpunhcEj%2ByaQqdd6ghkCYQDulSrMol%2BXKpZ9%2Fs9WP06tXd1G%2Br79O30iXL5947La9rsga%2FSfaWEuHKw8qzMWCn%2BZeN%2BRHFd53z5N8QUwbdwtVTsgOtOkMtCJKy5Pr%2F9cy39Bf&RelayState=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fa%2Fprinceton.edu%2FServiceLogin%3Fservice%3Dwise%26passive%3Dtrue%26osid%3D1%26continue%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fdrive.google.com%252Fa%252Fprinceton.edu%252Ffile%252Fd%252F0BwjFN4HbBrDBQUxZb2VYTE0yTzg%252Fview%26followup%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fdrive.google.com%252Fa%252Fprinceton.edu%252Ffile%252Fd%252F0BwjFN4HbBrDBQUxZb2VYTE0yTzg%252Fview)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cheawb:16

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().