Racial Disparities in Life Expectancy: How Much Can the Standard SES Variables Account for?

Michael Geruso

No 1229, Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing.

Abstract: This paper quantities the power of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics to account for black-white disparities in life expectancy in the US. While many studies have investigated the linkages between race, SES, and mortality, previous studies have almost universally reported results in terms of coefficients and odds ratios from hazard models. This paper attempts to illuminate how racial differences in mortality hazards aggregate into a net effect on the life course by reporting effects on life expectancies. The focus on life expectancy is facilitated by a reweighting technique, well-established in labor economics but novel in this context, that creates counterfactual estimates of black life expectancy in which income, education, employment and occupation, and other theoretically relevant characteristics among blacks are made to match the characteristics of whites. Among males, 80% of the black-white gap in life expectancy at age one can be accounted for by differences in socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. Among females, 70% percent of the gap is accounted for. Labor force participation, occupation, and, among women only, marital status have almost no power to explain the black-white disparity in life expectancy once precise measures for income and education are controlled for.

Keywords: life expectancy; blacks; whites; marital status; mortality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D19 D63 J10 J15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0B ... Um5vVExhTGgzczQ/view
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 400 Bad Request (https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBUm5vVExhTGgzczQ/view [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://www.google.com/a/princeton.edu/ServiceLogin?service=wise&passive=1209600&osid=1&continue=https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBUm5vVExhTGgzczQ/view&followup=https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBUm5vVExhTGgzczQ/view [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://idp.princeton.edu/idp/profile/SAML2/Redirect/SSO?SAMLRequest=fVJLT%2BMwEL4j7X%2BwfM%2BrXSRkNUEFhLYSu0Rt2AM340wSR84463Fa%2BPe4KQj2ANdvZr7HzKwunwfD9uBIW8x5FqecASpba2xz%2FlDdRhf8svhxtiI5mFGsJ9%2FhFv5NQJ6FSSQxF3I%2BORRWkiaBcgASXond%2BvedWMSpGJ31VlnD2eYm57btZT82um8UdgaN0f1Th1r149igDQUwbWs75Ozvu63F0daGaIINkpfoA5QuzqN0GS3TKluK7FykPx85K9%2BUrjSeEnxn6%2BnUROJXVZVReb%2BrZoK9rsH9Cd05b61tDcTKDkf5UhLpfYAbaQg4WxOB88HgtUWaBnA7cHut4GF7l%2FPO%2B5FEkhwOh%2FiDJpHJ6DQq8BZjqKdEKuLFvFwx53Oftvq9e%2Fmuzouv%2BVfJJ%2Bri7YjHbJub0hqtXtjaGHu4diB9CObdFHLdWjdI%2F7V6FmczouuomVvFhDSC0uF0NWdJcVL9%2F1vCD70C&RelayState=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fa%2Fprinceton.edu%2FServiceLogin%3Fservice%3Dwise%26passive%3Dtrue%26osid%3D1%26continue%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fdrive.google.com%252Fa%252Fprinceton.edu%252Ffile%252Fd%252F0BwjFN4HbBrDBUm5vVExhTGgzczQ%252Fview%26followup%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fdrive.google.com%252Fa%252Fprinceton.edu%252Ffile%252Fd%252F0BwjFN4HbBrDBUm5vVExhTGgzczQ%252Fview)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cheawb:76

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().