 How Reliable Are Administrative Reports of Paid Work Hours?Marta Lachowska, Alexandre Mas and Stephen Woodbury Working Papers from Princeton University. Economics Department. Abstract: This paper examines the quality of quarterly records on work hours collected from employers in the State of Washington to administer the unemployment insurance (UI) system. We subject the administrative records to four "trials," all of which suggest the records reliably measure paid hours of work. First, the distribution of hours in the administrative records exhibits far less "heaping" than does the distribution in the Current Population Survey (CPS). Second, quarter-to-quarter changes in the log of earnings are highly correlated with quarter-to-quarter changes in the log of paid hours. Third, annual changes in Washington's minimum wage rate (which is indexed) are clearly reflected in year-to-year changes in the distribution of work hours in the administrative data. Fourth, Mincer-style earnings and wage rate regressions using the administrative data produce estimates similar to those found elsewhere in the literature. We speculate that the administrative hours records in Washington are of high quality because they are collected for the purpose of administering unemployment insurance (UI), particularly to determine UI eligibility. Keywords: Employment; Unemployment Insurance System; Labor; Paid Hours of Work (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:econom:2018-11 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University. Economics Department. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.