Grouped Data Estimation and Testing in Simple Labor Supply Models

Joshua Angrist

No 614, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.

Abstract: Labor supply research has not yet produced a clear statement of the size of the labor supply elasticity nor how it should be measured. Measurement error in hourly wage data and the use of inappropriate identifying assumptions can account for the poor performance of some empirical labor supply models. I propose here a generalization of Wald's method of fitting straight lines that is robust to measurement error, imposes mild testable identifying assumptions, and is useful for the estimation of life-cycle labor supply models with panel data. A convenient Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS) equivalent of the generalized Wald estimator is presented and a TSLS over-identification test statistic is shown to be the test statistic for equality of alternative Wald estimates of the same parameter. These results are applied to labor supply models using a sample of continuously employed prime-age males. Labor supply elasticities from the two best-fitting models that pass tests of over-identifying restrictions range from 0.6 to 0.8 . A test for measurement error based on the difference between generalized Wald and Analysis of Covariance estimators is also proposed. Application of the test indicates that measurement error can account for low or negative Analysis of Covariance estimates of labor supply elasticities.

Keywords: labor supply; grouped data; Wald estimators (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D85 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1988-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp01v405s9384/1/234.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Internal Server Error

Related works:
Journal Article: Grouped-data estimation and testing in simple labor-supply models (1991)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:indrel:234

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon (bordelon@princeton.edu).