Moving At-Risk Teenagers Out of High-Risk Neighborhoods: Why Girls Fare Better Than Boys
Susan Cpublicet-Lundquist,
Greg Duncan (),
Kathryn Edin and
Jeffrey Kling
Additional contact information
Susan Cpublicet-Lundquist: Princeton University
Kathryn Edin: University of Pennsylvania
No 888, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.
Abstract:
The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment offered over 4,000 public housing residents in five U.S. cities the opportunity to move to very low poverty neighborhoods. Results from a survey conducted four to seven years after random assignment showed that boys in the experimental group fared no better or worse on measures of risk behavior than their control group counterparts, while girls in the experimental group demonstrated better mental health and lower risk behavior relative to control group girls. We seek to understand these differences by analyzing data from the survey and from in-depth interviews conducted with a random subsample of 86 teens 14 to 19 years old in Baltimore and Chicago. We find that control group boys, especially in Baltimore, deployed conscious strategies for avoiding neighborhood trouble, in contrast to many experimental boys who had subsequently moved back to higher poverty neighborhoods. Second, experimental group girls' patterns of activity fit in more easily in low poverty neighborhoods than boys', whose routines tended to draw negative reactions from community members and agents of social control. Third, experimental boys were far less likely to have strong connections to non-biological father figures than controls, which may have contributed to behavioral and mental health problems.
Keywords: neighborhood effects; social experiment; mixed methods; youth risk behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H43 I18 J18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp019306sz29r/1/509.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Internal Server Error
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:indrel:509
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().