Relative Risk Aversion Is Constant: Evidence from Panel Data
Pierre Chiappori () and
Discussion Papers from D.E.S. (Department of Economic Studies), University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy
Most classical tests of constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) based on individual portfolio composition use cross sectional data. Such tests must assume that the distributions of wealth and preferences are independent. We use panel data to analyze how individuals’ portfolio allocation between risky and riskless assets varies in response to changes in total financial wealth. We find the elasticity of the risky asset share to wealth to be small and statistically insignificant, supporting the CRRA assumption; this finding is robust when the sample is restricted to households experiencing ‘large’ income variations. Various extensions are discussed.
Keywords: - (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (33) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to economia.uniparthenope.it:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)
Journal Article: RELATIVE RISK AVERSION IS CONSTANT: EVIDENCE FROM PANEL DATA (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:prt:dpaper:5_2008
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from D.E.S. (Department of Economic Studies), University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonietta Milano ().