Tax progressivity and recent evolution of the Finnish income inequality
Ilpo Suoniemi,
Marja Riihelä and
Risto Sullström
No 246, Working Papers from Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE
Abstract:
After the Economic Crisis in early 1990s the Finnish economy has recovered rapidly,and simultaneously a major period of equalization from the mid 1970s to the mid1990s has been reversed, taking the levels of the Gini coefficient in a few years backto levels of inequality found 30 years ago. The paper examines how changes in Government policy, and in particular, in the incentives introduced by tax reforms have influenced income inequality. The paper introduces a decomposition of the Gini and concentration coefficients by population groups which are calculated for before and after-tax incomes to consider evolution of income inequality and tax progressivity in Finland over the period 1990–2004. Decompositions of the Gini coefficient of after-tax income by income sources give little information on the effects of taxation. In contrast, popular measures of tax progressivity (Reynolds and Smolensky1977) show a significant decrease. Our decomposition of the progressivity measureby income deciles focuses on changes in tax treatment of the income deciles in the ten year period after the mid 1990s. The changes in the decile shares of before-tax and after-tax income among those in the highest before-tax income deciles arethe main factors that lie behind the recent change in tax progressivity, and playan important role in explaining the recent surge in inequality. These changes have been accompanied with a change in the composition of factor income. There has been an unprecedented increase in capital income which has mainly accrued to the population groups at the high end of the income distribution after the mid 1990s.The change is most clearly seen among those in the top income percentage. The 1993 Finnish tax reform introducing the Nordic dual income tax model, and creating strong incentives to shift labour income to capital income for those in the highest marginal tax brackets, is among the key policy decisions responsible for this trend. Interestingly enough, but consistent with the income shifting hypothesis, we find no increase in horizontal inequality in response to the introduction of the dual incometax.
Keywords: Income inequality; Tax progressivity; Gini coefficient (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 D63 H24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
Date: 2008-12-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://labour.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sel246.pdf First version, 2008 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (https://labour.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sel246.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://labore.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sel246.pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Tax Progressivity and Recent Evolution of the Finnish Income Inequality (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pst:wpaper:246
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jaana Toivainen ().