Public provision, commodity demand and hours of work: An empirical analysis
Ilpo Suoniemi () and
Additional contact information
Ilpo Suoniemi: Palkansaajien tutkimuslaitos
No 261, Working Papers from Palkansaajien tutkimuslaitos, Labour Institute for Economic Research
Atkinson and Stiglitz (Journal of Public Economics 1976) show that when the government has access to non-linear income taxation and consumer preferences are separable between consumption and leisure, there is no need for differentiated commodity taxation. This paper examines the empirical validity of this claim using consumption data from Finland. The data have extensive information on commodity demand, the use of public services and hours of work. When labour income is controlled for in a semi-parametric way, we find that capital income and housing expenses are negatively associated with hours of work, whereas the use of child care is somewhat positively correlated with labour supply. These results suggest that capital income and housing should be taxed whereas day care could perhaps be subsidised.
Keywords: commodity taxation; public provision of private goods; semi-parametric methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C14 H21 H42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 27 pages
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://labour.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sel261.pdf First version, 2010 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pst:wpaper:261
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Palkansaajien tutkimuslaitos, Labour Institute for Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jaana Toivainen ().