Race And Gender Affinities In Voting: Experimental Evidence
Erin Tolley and
Additional contact information
Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant: Queen's University
Erin Tolley: University of Toronto
No 1370, Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University
We analyze the results of a large-scale experiment wherein subjects participate in a hypothetical primary election and must choose between two fictional candidates who vary by sex and race. We find evidence of affinities along these dimensions in voting behaviour. A number of phenomena regarding these affinities and their interactions are detailed and explored. We find that they compete with each other on the basis of race and gender. Neuroeconomic metrics suggest that people who vote for own race candidates tend to rely more on heuristics than those who do not.
Keywords: Voting; Gender; Prejudice; Race (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C90 D72 J15 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-dem, nep-exp, nep-gen, nep-gth, nep-pol, nep-soc and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econ.queensu.ca/sites/econ.queensu.ca/files/qed_wp_1370.pdf First version 2016 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qed:wpaper:1370
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Babcock ().