Disincentive Effects of Evaluation
Bruce Carlin and
Christopher Cotton ()
Additional contact information
Raphael Boleslavsky: University of Miami
Bruce Carlin: UCLA
No 1410, Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University
In a model of project design, evaluation, and selection, we explore how the incentives to improve the design of projects depend on the availability of funding and the process of evaluation. We show that project designers (researchers or NGOs) prefer to subject their projects to less-rigorous evaluations than donors or funding agencies would prefer, ex-post. We also show how an increase in either funding availability or the informativeness of evaluations tends to decrease investments in project quality. By implication, increased availability of funding or more-informative evaluations can lead to the implementation of fewer high-value projects.
Keywords: Game theory; Impact evaluation; Pilot studies; Funding allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 H43 O22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 19 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-cdm and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econ.queensu.ca/sites/econ.queensu.ca/files/wpaper/qed_wp_1410.pdf First version 2019 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qed:wpaper:1410
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Babcock ().