Should Star Performers Lead or Anchor Their Teams? Sequential Contributions in a Threshold Public Goods Experiment
Luca Corazzini,
Christopher Cotton and
Enrico Longo ()
Additional contact information
Luca Corazzini: University of Milan - Bicocca
Enrico Longo: Unviersity of Hamburg
No 1542, Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University
Abstract:
Collective efforts often rely on high-capacity “stars†—star employees, lead investors, or major donors—whose participation disproportionately determines success. Is it better to engage them early to set direction, or later to ensure completion? We investigate this strategic design problem experimentally, where collective success requires coordination on both direction and effort. We find that sequential engagement significantly outperforms simultaneous action, following a clear heuristic: stars should lead when the broader team is disorganized (to focus attention) but anchor when the team is already organized (to resolve effort failure). Regardless of when star engagement occurs, groups tend to support the majority’s preferred action when it is clear. Disorganized groups, in contrast, look to the preferences of the star for guidance. Finally, groups converge towards more equitable outcomes than equilibria imply, with the star taking on a disproportionate, but not excessive, share of costs. The timing that maximizes success also maximizes the payoffs of both the star and majority members, suggesting that managers can focus on effectiveness, relying on cooperative norms to prevent excessive free-riding and ensure fairness.
Keywords: Collective Action; Teamwork; Collaboration; Star Performer; Crowdfunding; Charitable Giving; Leadership; Organizational Design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D23 D71 H41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2025-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econ.queensu.ca/sites/econ.queensu.ca/files/wpaper/qed_wp_1542.pdf First version 2025 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qed:wpaper:1542
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Babcock ().