The Profitability of Early Canadian Railroads: Evidence from the Grand Trunk and Great Western Railway Companies Spring 1991

Ann Carlos and Frank Lewis

No 814, Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University

Abstract: This paper addresses whether government subsidies to two Canadian railroads built in the 1850s - the Grand Trunk and the Great Western - made economic sense. The historical literature suggests that these railroads, although privately unprofitable, were socially profitable. Through a careful study of company records, we find that the Great Western was socially profitable and that a relatively small additional subsidy would also have made it privately profitable. But the Grand Trunk was privately unprofitable and probably socially unprofitable as well. The form of the subsidy offered the railroads - loan guarantees - and the consequences, have a depressingly up-to-date ring. While the Great Western received small amounts of limited guarantees, the Grand Trunk received considerable aid. The Grand Trunk was then encouraged to issue large amounts of heavily discounted debt, which contributed to its eventual failure.

Pages: 43 pages
Date: 1991-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/working_papers/papers/qed_wp_814.pdf First version 1991 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qed:wpaper:814

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Babcock (babcockm@queensu.ca).