Bankruptcy Law and The Cost of Credit: The Impact of Cramdown on Mortgage Interest Rates

Joshua Goodman () and Adam Levitin

Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar

Abstract: Recent proposals to address housing market troubles through principal modification could increase the cost of credit in the mortgage market. We explore this possibility using historical variation in federal judicial rulings regarding whether Chapter 13 bankruptcy filers could reduce the principal owed on a home loan to the home?s market value. The practice, known as cramdown, was definitively prohibited by the Supreme Court in 1993. We find that home loans closed during the time when cramdown was allowed had interest rates 12-16 basis points higher than loans closed in the same state when cramdown was not allowed, which translates to a roughly one percent increase in monthly payments. Consistent with the theory that lenders are pricing in the risk of principal modification, interest rate increases are higher for the riskiest borrowers and zero for the least risky, as well as higher in states where Chapter 13 filing is more common.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://scholar.harvard.edu/joshuagoodman/node/117016

Related works:
Journal Article: Bankruptcy Law and the Cost of Credit: The Impact of Cramdown on Mortgage Interest Rates (2014)
Working Paper: Bankruptcy Law and the Cost of Credit: The Impact of Cramdown on Mortgage Interest Rates (2012)
Working Paper: Bankruptcy Law and The Cost of Credit: The Impact of Cramdown on Mortgage Interest Rates (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qsh:wpaper:117016

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Brandon ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).