EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Courts

Simeon Djankov, Rafael LaPorta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes () and Andrei Shleifer
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Rafael La Porta

Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar

Abstract: In cooperation with Lex Mundi member law firms in 109 countries, we measure and describe the exact procedures used by litigants and courts to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent and to collect a bounced check. We use these data to construct an index of procedural formalism of dispute resolution for each country. We find that such formalism is systematically greater in civil than in common law countries, and is associated with higher expected duration of judicial proceedings, less consistency, less honesty, less fairness in judicial decisions, and more corruption. These results suggest that legal transplantation may have led to an inefficiently high level of procedural formalism, particularly in developing countries.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://scholar.harvard.edu/shleifer/node/19471

Related works:
Journal Article: Courts (2003) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qsh:wpaper:19471

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Brandon ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:qsh:wpaper:19471