Survey mode effects on income inequality measurement

Pirmin Fessler, Maximilian Kasy and Peter Lindner

Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar

Abstract: In this paper, we study the effect of interview modes on estimates of economic inequality which are based on survey data. We exploit quasi-experimental variation in interview modes in the Austrian EU-SILC panel, where between 2007 and 2008 the interview mode was switched from personal interviews to telephone interviews for some but not all participants. We combine methods from the program evaluation literature (exploiting the panel structure and the rich set of covariates from the 2007 survey) with methods from the distributional decompo- sition literature (re-weighting and influence function regression) to obtain causal estimates of the effect of interview mode on estimated inequality. We find that the interview mode has a large effect on estimated inequality, where telephone interviews lead to a larger downward bias. The effect of the mode is much smaller for robust inequality measures such as interquantile ranges, as these are not sensitive to the tails of the distribution. The magnitude of effects we find are of a similar order as the differences in many international and intertemporal comparisons of inequality.

Date: 2012-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://scholar.harvard.edu/kasy/node/48766

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qsh:wpaper:48766

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Harvard University OpenScholar Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Richard Brandon ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).