The role in index jumps and cojumps in forecasting stock index volatility: Evidence from the Dow Jones index
Adam Clements and
Yin Liao ()
No 101, NCER Working Paper Series from National Centre for Econometric Research
Modeling and forecasting realized volatility is of paramount importance. Previous studies have examined the role of both the continuous and jump components of volatility in forecasting. This paper considers how to use index level jumps and cojumps across index constituents for forecasting index level volatility. In combination with the magnitude of past index jumps, the intensity of both index jumps and cojumps are examined. Estimated jump intensity from a point process model is used within a forecasting regression framework. Even in the presence of the diffusive part of total volatility, and past jump size, intensity of both index and cojumps are found to significantly improve forecast accuracy. An important contribution is that information relating to the behaviour of underlying constituent stocks is useful for forecasting index level behaviour. Improvements in forecast performance are particularly apparent on the days when jumps or cojumps occur, or when markets are turbulent.
Keywords: Realized volatility; diffusion; jumps; point process; Hawkes process; forecasting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 G00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-for and nep-mst
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qut:auncer:2014_02
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NCER Working Paper Series from National Centre for Econometric Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by School of Economics and Finance (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .