Trade and Colonial Status
José De Sousa () and
Julie Lochard
No 10-12, Working Papers SMART from INRAE UMR SMART
Abstract:
Does colonisation explain differences in trade performance across developing countries? In this paper, we analyse the differential impact of British versus French colonial legacies on the current trade of African ex-colonies. We initially find that former British colonies trade more, on average, than do their French counterparts. This difference might be the result of the relative superiority of British institutions. However, a core concern is the non-random selection of colonies by the British. Historians argue that with Britain, trade preceded colonisation. Using an instrument based on colonisation history to control for this endogeneity, we find no evidence of a systematic difference between the British and French colonial legacies with respect to trade. This finding suggests that the apparent better performance of British ex-colonies might be instead explained by pre-colonial conditions.
Keywords: Trade; colonisation; Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F10 F54 O55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 p.
Date: 2010
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr, nep-his, nep-int and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/210388/2/WP%20SMART-LERECO%2010.12.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Trade and Colonial Status (2010) 
Working Paper: Trade and colonial status (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rae:wpaper:201012
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers SMART from INRAE UMR SMART Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Chauvel ().