Option Prices and Implied Volatilities: An Empirical Analysis

Malcolm Edey and Graham Elliott ()
Additional contact information
Malcolm Edey: Reserve Bank of Australia

RBA Research Discussion Papers from Reserve Bank of Australia

Abstract: This paper investigates the efficiency of Australian options markets using a version of the Black-Scholes model. Under the joint null hypothesis that the pricing model is valid, and that forecasts are efficient, the implied volatilities calculated from observed option prices should be efficient predictors of squared changes in the prices of the underlying instruments. This hypothesis is tested using weekly data on prices of Australian financial futures options, and over-the-counter currency options. The results indicate significant forecasting biases for each of the contracts studied. In each case, implied volatilities appear to overpredict changes in the true volatility of underlying prices. Although these conclusions are conditional on the validity of the pricing model used to calculate implied volatilities, our evidence suggests that biases in the Black-Scholes formula are unlikely to explain fully the apparent forecast biases.

Date: 1989-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/1989/8902.html

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rba:rbardp:rdp8902

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RBA Research Discussion Papers from Reserve Bank of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paula Drew ().