Should Portfolio Model Inputs Be Estimated Using One or Two Economic Regimes?
Emmanouil Platanakis (),
Athanasios Sakkas () and
Charles Sutcliffe ()
Additional contact information
Emmanouil Platanakis: School of Management, University of Bath
Athanasios Sakkas: Southampton Business School, University of Southampton
No icma-dp2017-07, ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance from Henley Business School, Reading University
Estimation errors in the inputs are the main problem when applying portfolio analysis. Markov regime switching models are used to reduce these errors, but they do not always improve out-of-sample portfolio performance. We investigate the levels of transaction costs and risk aversion below which the use of two regimes is superior to one regime for an investor with a CRRA utility function, allowing for skewed and kurtic returns. Our results suggest that, due to differences in risk and transactions costs, most retail investors should use one regime models, while investment banks should use two regime models.
Keywords: finance; portfolio theory; regime shifting; transaction costs; risk aversion; constant relative risk aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ore, nep-rmg and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/assets.henley.a ... mtime=20171016141718 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rdg:icmadp:icma-dp2017-07
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance from Henley Business School, Reading University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marie Pearson ().