EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Valuation Accuracy: Reconciling the Timing of the Valuation and Sale

Neil Crosby (), Steven Devaney (), Tony Key and George Matysiak
Additional contact information
Neil Crosby: Department of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading Business School
Steven Devaney: Department of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading Business School

Real Estate & Planning Working Papers from Henley Business School, Reading University

Abstract: Carsberg (2002) suggested that the periodic valuation accuracy studies undertaken by, amongst others, IPD/Drivers Jonas (2003) should be undertaken every year and be sponsored by the RICS, which acts as the self-regulating body for valuations in the UK. This paper does not address the wider issues concerning the nature of properties which are sold and whether the sale prices are influenced by prior valuations, but considers solely the technical issues concerning the timing of the valuation and sales data. This study uses valuations and sales data from the Investment Property Databank UK Monthly Index to attempt to identify the date that sale data is divulged to valuers. This information will inform accuracy studies that use a cut-off date as to the closeness of valuations to sales completion date as a yardstick for excluding data from the analysis. It will also, assuming valuers are informed quickly of any agreed sales, help to determine the actual sale agreed date rather than the completion date, which includes a period of due diligence between when the sale is agreed and its completion. Valuations should be updated to this date, rather than the formal completion date, if a reliable measure of valuation accuracy is to be determined. An accuracy study is then undertaken using a variety of updating periods and the differences between the results are examined. The paper concludes that the sale only becomes known to valuers in the month prior to the sale taking place and that this assumes either that sales due diligence procedures are shortening or valuers are not told quickly of agreed sale prices. Studies that adopt a four-month cut-off date for any valuations compared to sales completion dates are over cautious, and this could be reduced to two months without compromising the data.

Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.reading.ac.uk/LM/LM/fulltxt/0603.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Valuation Accuracy: reconciling the timing of the valuation and sale (2003) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2003-06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Real Estate & Planning Working Papers from Henley Business School, Reading University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marie Pearson ().

 
Page updated 2021-04-20
Handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2003-06