Compensation for Electricity Consumers Under a U.S. CO2 Emissions Cap

Anthony Paul (), Dallas Burtraw and Karen Palmer
Additional contact information
Anthony Paul: Resources for the Future

RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future

Abstract: Policies to cap emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the U.S. economy could pose significant costs on the electricity sector, which contributes roughly 40 percent of total CO2 emissions in the U.S. Using a detailed simulation model of the electricity sector, we evaluate alternative ways that emission allowances can be allocated. Most previous emissions trading programs have allocated the major portion of allowances for free to incumbent firms. In the electricity sector this approach would lead to changes in electricity price that vary by region primarily based primarily on whether prices are market-based or determined by cost-of-service regulation. Allocation to customers, which could be achieved by allocation to local distribution companies (retail utilities) would recover symmetry in the effect of free allocation and lead to signficiantly lower overall electricity prices. However, this form of compensation comes with an efficiency cost that will increase the overall cost of climate policy.

Keywords: emissions trading; allowance allocations; electricity; air pollution; auction; grandfathering; cost-effectiveness; greenhouse gases; climate change; global warming; carbon dioxide; asset value; compensation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L94 Q2 Q25 Q4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-07-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-08-25.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-08-25.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-08-25.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-08-25

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().