Cap-and-Trade Programs under Delayed Compliance
Makoto Hasegawa () and
Stephen Salant ()
Discussion Papers from Resources For the Future
Previous analyses of cap-and-trade programs regulating carbon emissions assumed that firms must surrender permits as they pollute. If so, then the price of permits may remain constant over measurable intervals if the government injects additional permits at a ceiling price or may even collapse if more permits are injected through an auction. However, no cap-and-trade program actually requires continual compliance. The three federal bills and California's AB-32, for example, instead require that firms surrender permits only periodically to cover their cumulative emissions since the last compliance period. Anticipated injections of additional permits during the compliance period should have different effects than under continual compliance. We develop a methodology for analyzing the effects of such permit injections. Using it, we explain why sales provisions of one federal bill might generate a speculative attack in the permit market and why provisions of AB-32 may undermine the very existence of an equilibrium.
Keywords: emissions trading; marketable permits; price collar; safety valve; price ceiling; price floor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q54 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-12-32.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-12-32.pdf)
Working Paper: Cap-and-Trade Programs under Delayed Compliance (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-12-32
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Resources For the Future
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Webmaster ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).