Price Regulation and Environmental Externalities: Evidence from Methane Leaks

Catherine Hausman and Lucija Muehlenbachs

No 16-23, RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future

Abstract: We estimate expenditures by US natural gas distribution firms to reduce natural gas leaks. Reducing leaks averts commodity losses (valued at around $5/Mcf), but also climate damages ($27/Mcf) because the primary component of natural gas is methane, a potent greenhouse gas. In addition to this private/social wedge, incentives to abate are weakened by this industry's status as a regulated natural monopoly: current price regulations allow many distribution firms to pass the cost of any leaked gas on to their customers. Our estimates imply that too little is spent repairing leaks—we estimate expenditures substantially below $5/Mcf, i.e. less than the commodity value of the leaked gas. In contrast, expenditures on accelerated pipeline replacement are in general higher than the combination of gas costs and climate benefi ts (we estimate expenditures ranging from $48/Mcf to $211/Mcf). We conclude by relating these fi ndings to regulatory-induced incentives in the industry.

Date: 2016-02-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rff.org/documents/1722/RFF20DP-16-23-REV2.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Price Regulation and Environmental Externalities: Evidence from Methane Leaks (2019)
Working Paper: Price Regulation and Environmental Externalities: Evidence from Methane Leaks (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-16-23

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().