EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Global Energy Outlook Comparison Methods: 2019 Update

Richard G. Newell and Daniel Raimi
Additional contact information
Richard G. Newell: Resources for the Future
Daniel Raimi: Resources for the Future

No 19-07, RFF Reports from Resources for the Future

Abstract: We update a harmonization methodology previously developed in 2015 to facilitate comparisons of long-term global energy projections issued by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, BP, Equinor, ExxonMobil, the International Energy Agency (IEA), the Institute for Energy and Economics (Japan), the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Shell, and the US Energy Information Administration. Decisionmakers in the public and private sector rely on these projections to inform investments and policy, but comparing these outlooks on an apples-to-apples basis is not possible due to a variety of methodological differences. For example, the US EIA and BP’s exclude non-marketed traditional biomass, resulting in estimates of global primary energy consumption that are 8% to 11% lower than other projections. Assumptions about energy content of fossil fuels can vary by more than 11% in the data examined here, requiring significant adjustment of primary energy consumption estimates. Conventions about primary energy conversion of renewables can also alter estimates by as much as a 65% decrease to a 3.8-fold increase for particular electricity sources, relative to IEA estimates. We also find that there are significant differences in historical data used in these outlooks, even when measured in fuel-specific physical units such as barrels, cubic meters, or tonnes. After taking into account these differences, our harmonization methodology brings estimates within 3% or less of one another for most fuels in the benchmark year of 2016. In this document, we describe the process by which we enhance the comparability of outlooks by adjusting for differences in assumptions such as fuel classifications, energy content assumptions, conversion efficiencies, and more. We present a selection of the harmonized results, benchmarked to the IEA’s 2018 World Energy Outlook. This methodology is used to develop our Global Energy Outlook 2019 report.

Date: 2019-07-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rff.org/documents/2132/GEO_methodology_report_20190625_4_3Y9i2sg.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:report:rp-19-07

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Reports from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-30
Handle: RePEc:rff:report:rp-19-07