The Investment Version of the Asian Noodle Bowl: The Proliferation of International Investment Agreements

Julien Chaisse () and Shintaro Hamanaka ()
Additional contact information
Julien Chaisse: The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shintaro Hamanaka: Asian Development Bank, Postal: 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, Philippines, http://www.adb.org

No 128, Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration from Asian Development Bank

Abstract: While there is an extensive amount of literature on the noodle bowl of agreements in Asia, the majority of studies exclusively focus on trade (in goods). So far, little emphasis has been placed on the proliferation of international investment treaties (IIAs). Given the significance of IIAs, it is ideal to tackle them extensively as well. Investment chapters under free trade agreements (FTAs) and bilateral and plurilateral investment treaties constitute IIAs. There are more than 1,000 IIAs in Asia. The noodle bowl of FTAs usually results in more options for traders and even can bring unexpected preferences for third parties. These outcomes are all welfare-enhancing, but the literature has overemphasized the effect of complicated rules of origins and other issues. On the other hand, the story of the proliferation of IIAs and the investment noodle bowl is totally different, and as such would lead to inconsistency across IIAs and bring legal interpretation problems as well as the proliferation of unexpected investor-state disputes. This paper aims to provide a detailed reading of recent advances in Asian investment rulemaking and a finer appreciation of how rules in Asian IIAs have evolved in response to stimuli. While existing studies mainly deal with the interpretation and application of the IIAs in which the rules are given, this study deals in turn with the development of rules, including investment protection. The main objective of the paper is to describe and provide an exhaustive mapping of the recent Asian experiences in investment rule-making through regional and bilateral agreements, providing a detailed analytical account of key dimensions of investment treaties. This comprehensive study offers insights on the possible make-up of future attempts at embedding comprehensive investment norms into the regional (such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership) and/or WTO architecture.

Keywords: bilateral investment treaty (BIT); free trade agreement (FTA); foreign direct investment (FDI); noodle bowl; investor–state dispute (ISD) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F21 F51 F53 F55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 64 pages
Date: 2014-04-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int and nep-sea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://aric.adb.org/pdf/workingpaper/WP128_Hamanaka_Investment_Noodle_Bowl.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:adbrei:0128

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration from Asian Development Bank Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivan B. de Leon ().