A Laboratory Experiment to Compare Two Market Institutions for Emissions Trading

Gaurav Ghosh (), Anthony Kwasnica () and James Shortle
Additional contact information
Gaurav Ghosh: E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), Postal: Mathieustrasse 6, 52074 Aachen, Germany, http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/fcn
Anthony Kwasnica: Department of Insurance and Real Estate, Pennsylvania State University, Postal: 332 Business Building, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.

No 18/2010, FCN Working Papers from E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN)

Abstract: We report results from an economic experiment where two markets institutions for controlling water pollution are compared. In the status quo institution, permit trades between point and nonpoint sources are subject to a trading ratio. In the alternative, nonpoint abatements are converted into permits with multiple attributes. The test bed captures important features of existing markets for water quality trading. First, pollution is stochastic, poorly observed and imperfectly controlled by nonpoints. Second, the market is characterized by oligopsony. The results indicate that the multi-attribute market generates a superior environmental outcome to the trading ratio market. Furthermore, the average cost of pollution control is lower in the multi-attribute market. Market power is found to be independent of the type of market institution, but sellers of permits learn to resist market power as they gain experience. This is at the cost of market efficiency since their resistance reduces the number of trades.

Keywords: Experimental Economics; Market Design; Oligopsony; Stochastic Pollution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2010-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.fcn.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/global/show_document.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaagvvjc Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:fcnwpa:2010_018

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FCN Working Papers from E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hendrik Schmitz ().