주요국의 사회서비스 일자리 분석 및 정책시사점(Case Studies and Empirical Analysis in Social Services Employment)

Dong-Hee Joe, Sungwoo Hong (), Youngook Jang () and JungEun Lee ()
Additional contact information
Sungwoo Hong: KOREA INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY (KIEP), Postal: [30147] Building C, Sejong National Research Complex, 370, Sicheong-daero, Sejong-si, Korea, https://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/
Youngook Jang: KOREA INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY (KIEP), Postal: [30147] Building C, Sejong National Research Complex, 370, Sicheong-daero, Sejong-si, Korea, https://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/
JungEun Lee: KOREA INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY (KIEP), Postal: [30147] Building C, Sejong National Research Complex, 370, Sicheong-daero, Sejong-si, Korea, https://www.kiep.go.kr/eng/

No 21-29, Policy Analyses from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy

Abstract: 한국은 주요국 중 인구 대비 사회서비스 일자리가 적은 편이며, 인구고령화와 소득수준 상승으로 사회서비스 수요가 지속적으로 증가할 전망이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 사회서비스 일자리 정책 방향을 모색하기 위한 참고자료를 제공하고자 사회서비스 일자리 규모를 국제비교하고, 주요국의 사례를 심층분석하였으며, 사회서비스 일자리 규모의 결정요인을 실증분석하였다. 사례분석 국가는 사회복지체제 유형별 대표적 국가로 보수주의 독일, 자유주의 영국, 사회민주주의 스웨덴이며, 지역별로는 동아시아의 일본을 일관된 틀로 분석하였다. 실증분석에서는 관련 문헌에서 적정 사회서비스 일자리 규모의 결정요인으로 제시된 변수들이 인구 대비 사회서비스 일자리 규모에 미치는 영향에 대한 패널모형을 추정하였다. This study (i) compares the size of social services employment across countries, (ii) case-studies benchmark countries and (iii) estimates the determinants of social services employment. By doing so, this study aims to offer a comprehensive reference for policy making in related fields in Korea. In particular, this study compares the size of social services employment per population using the OECD data. Motivated by the Moon Jae-in administration’s expansion of social services employment, this study compares the value of this variable in 2016, right before the Moon administration, and in 2019, the most recent data available as of this study, across countries. This study takes the representative countries for each category of the commonly used categorization of welfare state regimes, namely Germany (Conservative), the United Kingdom (Liberal), Sweden (Socio-democratic) and Japan (East-Asia). For each case, this study looks at the definition of social services, characteristics of their delivery and the sizes of government spending and employment in that sector. Finally, this study estimates a fixed-effects panel model for the determinants of the size of social services employment per population, using the OECD data.

Keywords: 노동시장; 경쟁정책; Labor market; competition policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 142 pages
Date: 2021-12-27
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a10101020000 ... no=10196&cg_code=C03 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:kieppa:2021_029

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Policy Analyses from Korea Institute for International Economic Policy [30147] 3rd Floor Building C Sejong National Research Complex 370 Sicheong-daero Sejong-si, Korea. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Juwon Seo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).