Stabilizing the Macroeconomy with Labor Market Policies

Oh Jong-seok () and Hong Sung Wook ()
Additional contact information
Oh Jong-seok: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Postal: Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea, http://www.kiet.re.kr
Hong Sung Wook: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Postal: Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea, http://www.kiet.re.kr

No 21/1, Occasional Papers from Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade

Abstract: The use of active labor market policies was critical during the global financial crisis of 2008. While the U.S. economy underwent a slow recovery despite the most aggressive fiscal and monetary policies pursued since the Great Depression, by contrast the German economy, having implemented active labor market policies such as the Working Time Account, experienced a prompt recovery process. To begin with, we focus on the cyclicality of the share of labor income, that is, the moving correlation between the GDP growth rate and the share of labor income, as a measure of stability in the labor market. If the labor income share exhibits counter-cyclical movement in the business cycle, we can interpret that the labor market is stable. On the other hand, if it shows a procyclical movement, it implies that some stabilizing policy measures are required. We found that in Korea, the share of labor income is mostly countercyclical and the share of labor income in the manufacturing sector was procyclical in the period between the East Asian economic crisis and the global financial crisis. In addition, the counter-cyclicality of the labor income share in the overall economy seems to be led by the service sector, since the service sector’s moving correlation is located below that of the manufacturing sector. This study argues that aggregate demand management policies alone (which have traditionally been used to stabilize economies) may not be effective in the current crisis and argues that they should instead be implemented alongside labor market policies such as work sharing programs.

Keywords: labor economics; labor policy; macroeconomics; macroeconomic policy; labor demand; labor supply; human capital; labor productivity; business cycle; labor income; income distribution; wages; compensation; wage structure; wage levels; work sharing; employment; labor market; labor market policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J08 J20 J21 J22 J23 J31 J38 J48 J62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 91 pages
Date: 2021-04-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4182072 Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:kietop:2021_001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Occasional Papers from Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade Sejong National Research Complex, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, 370 Sicheong Dae-ro C-dong 8-12F 30147, Republic of Korea. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aaron Crossen ().